User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61501 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64858 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 213.126.68.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Home Alone (franchise) was changed by 213.126.68.182 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957592 on 2025-01-29T09:42:45+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 09:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2601:601:C83:1320:6078:35E3:FDEE:6C24 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Party Mix! (diff): vandalism after final warning. Edit-warring by Special:Contributions/2601:601:C83:1320:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/73.109.165.4. Binksternet (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:601:C83:1320:997A:BBDC:49BD:1091 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Party Mix! (diff): vandalism after final warning. Long-term abuse, edit-warring. The /64 should be blocked. Binksternet (talk) 06:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1004:B15A:EDC8:E587:C759:1C7F:7ACA (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning Bosco Sin (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2A01:B340:61:67D5:ED96:6067:ABF1:1E41 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Obvious vandalism only 88TylerDurden (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- IP address needs to be blocked from editing 79.125.235.212 (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 195.224.221.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism only, see also filter log. Annh07 (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- RedaniaStudio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Wikipedia:Sandbox (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. https://redaniastudio.com. Theroadislong (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Faisaldawood10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Persistent spammer. KH-1 (talk) 11:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nyu111i (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Continues to add the same unsourced content at Edmonton, first as this blocked IP, and now as a registered account. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- HamzaQamar1521 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Shahram Khan Tarakai: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 11:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jhonses (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Talk:Free ad-supported streaming television (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Talk page spam. Belbury (talk) 11:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Khan Design Studio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. —Bruce1eetalk 11:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- PropagandaProtection (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fake[- ]*news|disinformation|propaganda" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mohamedsalahbengalurufcsuperfan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Digitttttttttt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Rahul SINGH Graphic Designers & Video Editor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- My553cornell.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stinky75 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Bob is about to be about the mimic octopus (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mevagissey marketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- BruinsPleaseWin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "ruin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikileaked Media (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Anderson1983Records (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Anchornoor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used rn instead of m attempting to skip filter: homo. Violating string: anchomoor" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Garydeangraytdcjnumber2071249 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Without Limits Group (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Tccmediacom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Https://www.tccmedia.co. Theroadislong (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tom And Gee (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. VancityRothaug (talk) 11:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Lipstickberlin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (lipstickberlin.com). —Bruce1eetalk 11:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Continuous vandalism of IP Address, and might have a edit war ROY is WAR Talk! 05:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: HorrorLover555 keeps removing correct information using many unreliable books
Not done I have already protected the article if you have a complaint about an editor and edit warring you should go here WP:AN3 Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Dr vulpes: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment:
HorrorLover555 keeps removing correct information using many unreliable books
Clearly this is a false accusation, as I have followed the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, as those sources they are continuing to restore have been disputed. This is clearly something that needs to be discussed at Talk:Triumph Tour instead of going back-and-forth over. HorrorLover555 (talk) 07:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of materials, with a reference that don't support the IP user's edits.[1][2][3] Hotwiki (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing persisting after past protection expiration. Sarsenet (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Meant to select temporary semi-protection in Twinkle, my bad! Sarsenet (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse at B-52s articles from Special:Contributions/73.109.165.4 and Special:Contributions/2601:601:C83:1320:0:0:0:0/64. They keep removing the historically correct apostrophe from the band's name. The protection should also extend to the following pages: Give Me Back My Man, Mesopotamia (EP), Private Idaho, Dance This Mess Around, Rock Lobster, Roam, Love Shack, Whammy!, Summer of Love (The B-52's song), Channel Z (song) and Party Out of Bounds. Binksternet (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I ShowSpeed became Prime Minister of Serbia for hour and now this page has had an uptick of vandalism 2409:40D4:107C:67B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
ARBPIA articles
[edit]Reason: In a recent case, the arbitration committee decided
"All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article.
"
The committee later clarified that this applied only to articles wholly or mostly in the topic, and not to pages which have only a minority of their content in the topic.
I have made a list of those articles which are identified as included in ARBPIA by a talk page template but are not EC-protected. If you protect any, please remove them from the list. (I am involved, so I can't protect them myself.)
In principle all of these should now be EC-protected, but there are rather a lot (over 2000). Is there a tool that allows mass protection of articles given in a list? I can provide the list in another format if it helps. Zerotalk 08:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Zero0000 I think I can do this it shouldn't be that hard but it'll be a little bit hacky. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page and I'll see what I can do tomorrow as for right now the format is fine, but if you could get it to me in a .csv it would save some time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page has been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. Namnewstyle (talk) 10:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous and registered users have persistently vandalized the page. Namnewstyle (talk) 10:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive edits by Anonymous IP Address. Gunther : Talk 11:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 6 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I am requesting AWB rights to assist with repetitive and time-consuming tasks like correcting formatting issues, standardising citation styles, updating outdated links, and organising categories. My goal: improve the quality and consistency of Wikipedia articles with an interest in contributing to medicine/biology. waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request the necessary permissions to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on my Wikipedia account. I value the security of my account and believe that adding 2FA will provide an additional layer of protection, ensuring the safety of my contributions and the integrity of my account. My Contributions: Username: Jjackson10003 Account Details: Autoconfirmed user since August 10, 2020, with 10 edits to date. I have actively contributed to Wikipedia by [briefly describe your contributions, such as editing specific articles, creating pages, or participating in discussions]. Reason for Request: As technology evolves, the risk of account hijacking increases, particularly with the rise of AI and changes in regimes that may encourage bad actors to exploit vulnerabilities. Enabling 2FA will significantly reduce the likelihood of unauthorized access to my account and prevent potential misuse. Ensuring account security is critical, both for individual users and for the protection of Wikipedia’s broader community and platform integrity. While I am currently an autoconfirmed user, I understand that 2FA is typically reserved for users with advanced permissions. I kindly request that I be considered for either extended confirmed user status or temporary access to enable 2FA. Commitment to Wikipedia Standards: I am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, ensuring that my contributions adhere to community standards. I believe that my request aligns with the shared goal of maintaining a secure and trustworthy environment for editors and the broader Wikipedia community. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if there is any additional information or clarification needed. I am happy to provide further details about my contributions or intentions. Sincerely, Jjackson10003 Jjackson10003 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly. I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit articles on biology, particularly fishes. I frequently (over 300 times so far, I am told) have to request a move of the only species in a monotypic genus from the species name to the genus name,as per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, over a redirect, and would like to be able to do this without having to request a move. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm very active on Wikipedia, with over 2,100 edits, and I'm well acquainted with WP:VAND and what vandalism is not. I can contribute to reducing backlogs by reviewing pending changes. Mr.Hanes |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [8] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
