User talk:Jplatt39

Welcome!

Hello, Jplatt39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 03:47, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

Stew Albert

An error of mine. Sorry about that. I just fixed. Thanks Hmains 20:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book of the New Sun

The problem I have with all these sub-genres ans sub-sub-genres is they have no clear definitions and limits. Probably the best definition is that the genre is assigned by what is hoped will create the largest sales: is s-f big it's s-f; is fantasy big it's s-fantasy; could it sell as mainstream then s-f and fantasy disappear from the cover; and is the author known as a s-f writer then his historical novel is gonna be in the s-f section of the bookstore. But I don't think that idea would fly well in the articles.Nitpyck (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jplatt39! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

John Celardo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Gray

Hey there, I saw your message about the Harold Gray page. Said vandalism has now been reverted. To do this yourself, go to the history page and compare diffs until you find a stable version, and edit (and save) that page with an edit summary something like "reverting back to last stable version". Hope that helps! -- Casmith_789 (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. When you recently edited Bau (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sao Vicente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles W. Schwartz

Hello, Jplatt39. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Charles W. Schwartz, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jplatt39. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Keefe

The article Jim Keefe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP cites only one non-independent source. Search revealed no significant coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenny Marks (talk) 19:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]