Timeline of the English Reformation is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Timeline of the English Reformation is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This page needs a lot of work. How can a timeline of the Reformation not mention Luther, Calvin, or Zwingli? The English Reformation was obviously very important (and I am largely a product of its work), but golly...we really need to add more here. KHM03 16:45, 11 May (UTC)
Yes, and it should not be arranged so as to indicate that the English Reformation begins and ends with Hank the 8th. Dan Knauss19:02, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed wholeheartedly. It’s been literally 20 years but do check back. I’ve tried to put in as many missing elements as possible including reference to foreign reformers such as Bucer and Peter Martyr and their visits to Britain at Cranmer’s invitation. Resisted including too many foreign dates because it is about our reforms after all. Perhaps most importantly I’ve included a preamble acknowledging the Wycliffe and the Lollards Me.Autem.Minui (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
^^load of rubbish
--- --- INACCURATE! The writer of this page needs to update his facts. When talking about Queen Mary (aka Bloody Mary), the author mentions that 300 Protestants were killed by her. However, he neglects to mention the countless Catholics that were killed by Henry VIII, Edward VI amd Elizabeth I. There is no comparison which shows the author is, at best, ignorant of the history or, at worst, biased in his reporting.
Myrnabea (talk) 03:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrnabea (talk • contribs) 03:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
